Planning Policy
Planning Policy / Guides / Planning permission for a garden office

Planning permission for a garden office

Usually no application needed at all — if you respect the Class E limits. Height is the variable that causes the trouble.

policy quoted verbatim · statistics from real decided applications
1.0

Class E: the garden building rights

Outbuildings "incidental to the enjoyment of the house" — offices, gyms, studios, stores — are the textbook Class E case. Limits apply to height (2.5 metres within 2 metres of a boundary), coverage (no more than half the garden), and siting (not forward of the house).

This provides permitted development rights within the curtilage of a house for: (a) any building or enclosure, swimming or other pool required for a purpose incidental to the enjoymentPD technical guidance, Class E · full text in the library → · official source →
2.0

Where it tightens

In conservation areas, buildings at the side of the house lose Class E rights, and anything visible above fence lines invites scrutiny of the area's setting. "Incidental" also matters: a garden office is fine; a self-contained annexe with sleeping accommodation is not incidental and needs permission.

The pattern in refusals is consistent: height and forward siting. A garden office that sits low and defers to the boundary passes almost by construction.

In practice

See it in a complete report

In our Richmond example, 77 of 85 decided outbuilding applications within 1 km were approved — 91%, the most-approved project type we measured.

Read the garden office in richmond example →

Your address

General guidance ends here. Your property is specific.

The free check reads the designations on your exact property in seconds. The full report applies the policies above — and your council’s own Local Plan — to your project, with every quote verified against its source.

Check your postcode — free