Planning Policy
Planning Policy / Example reports / House into two flats in Greenwich
example report · generated from live data · quotes verified against source

This is a real Planning Policy Pro report for a real Greenwich · SE10 postcode, generated by the same engine that builds customer reports. The designations were read live from the official index, the nearby decisions link to real council records, and every policy quote passed the verification gate. Yours would look like this — for your address and your project.

Planning Policy · Pro report · Example report

Your project at SE10 8XJ

Greenwich · Generated 12 June 2026 · “Convert the house into two self-contained flats

1. Your site at a glance

Three designations apply at this address — and one of them is rare: this part of Greenwich sits within the Maritime Greenwich World Heritage Site, alongside a conservation area and the borough Air Quality Management Area. Converting a house into two flats here is a change-of-use application judged on housing standards and heritage at the same time: the council must weigh the benefit of an extra home against any effect on a site of international significance.

2. What applies here

More homes from the same land — NPPF paragraph 124

National policy actively supports making better use of existing buildings to meet housing need. A well-specified conversion — two decent homes, adequate space standards, bins and bikes resolved — starts with this policy behind it.

Planning policies and decisions should promote an effective use of land in meeting the need for homes and other uses, while safeguarding and improving the environment and ensuring safe and healthy living conditions.NPPF paragraph 124 — 11. Making effective use of land · read the source →

London's housing quality bar — London Plan Policy D6

Conversions are decided against the same quality standards as new homes: room sizes against Table 3.1 of the London Plan, layouts, light and outlook. Most refused conversions in this area fail here, not on the principle — design the two flats to the standards and the application argues for itself.

Housing development should be of high quality design and provide adequately-sized rooms (see Table 3.1) with comfortable and functional layouts which are fit for purpose and meet the needs of LondonersLondon Plan Policy D6 — Housing quality and standards (Chapter 3 — Design) · read the source →

The World Heritage Site raises the stakes — NPPF paragraph 212

Great weight scales with the importance of the asset, and a World Heritage Site is the top of that scale. For an internal conversion the heritage effects are usually modest — but external alterations, extractor flues, and bin storage visible from the street will be tested against this standard.

When considering the impact of a proposed development on the significance of a designated heritage asset, great weight should be given to the asset’s conservation (and the more important the asset, the greater the weight should be).NPPF paragraph 212 — 16. Conserving and enhancing the historic environment · read the source →

Significance is specific, even here — NPPF paragraph 220

National policy names World Heritage Sites directly: not every element contributes equally to outstanding universal value. A heritage statement that locates your building honestly within the site's significance keeps the application proportionate.

Not all elements of a Conservation Area or World Heritage Site will necessarily contribute to its significance.NPPF paragraph 220 — 16. Conserving and enhancing the historic environment · read the source →

Design standards still apply inside — NPPF paragraph 139

Subdivisions fail most often on quality grounds: undersized rooms, poor outlook, no amenity space. The design-refusal policy applies to conversions exactly as it does to new buildings.

Development that is not well designed should be refused, especially where it fails to reflect local design policies and government guidance on design , taking into account any local design guidance and supplementary planning documents which use visual tools such as design guides and codes.NPPF paragraph 139 — 12. Achieving well-designed places · read the source →

3. Potential blockers

Nothing in this category for your project — a genuine finding, not an omission.

4. Things to consider

Air Quality Management Area

This address is in an Air Quality Management Area (Greenwich AQMA); air quality impacts may be a material consideration for some projects.

World Heritage Site

This address is in a World Heritage Site (Maritime Greenwich); protecting its outstanding universal value carries great weight.

Conservation area

This address is in the conservation area. Your council must give special attention to preserving or enhancing the area's character, which raises the design bar for external changes.

5. Approved nearby

267
decided nearby
207
approved
60
refused
78%
approval rate

Of the 267 decided change-of-use applications within 1 km of this address since 2015, 207 were approved and 60 refused — a 78% approval rate. Conversions are common and generally successful in this part of Greenwich, including within the World Heritage Site setting. The refused cases below are instructive: quality of the resulting homes, not the principle of conversion, is where schemes fall down.

  • Approved · Proposed side extension including replacement of windows, roof lights and doors, and internal alterations. (2025-07-18) council record →
  • Approved · Proposed side extension including replacement of windows, roof lights and doors, and internal alterations. (2025-07-18) council record →
  • Approved · Construction of a single storey side infill extension and replacement of all existing sash windows and associated works. (2025-07-16) council record →
  • Approved · Construction of a loft extension including a juliette balcony and 3 roof lights (2024-10-09) council record →
  • Approved · Construction of a single rear extension and all associated works. (2024-09-20) council record →
  • Approved · Demolition of existing extension and construction of a replacement single storey rear extension. (2024-08-14) council record →
Verification. 5 policy quotes in this report were checked character-for-character against their official sources before it was generated. All passed.
  • Designations are read live from planning.data.gov.uk at generation time. Some councils have not yet published every dataset; absence of a designation here is absence from the national index, not a guarantee none exists.
  • This example was generated with national policy and live designation data. Purchased reports also include the council's adopted Local Plan policies where the plan can be machine-read — and say so plainly where it cannot.

This is a professional screening report built from official public data. It is not legal advice, a planning decision, or a substitute for pre-application advice from your local planning authority. Always confirm requirements with your authority before starting work.

Other examples: Rear extension in Clapham · Basement excavation in Notting Hill · Loft conversion in Walthamstow · Garden office in Richmond